AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Getting that Non-Contributing Team Member to Shape Up!

Ever asked yourself: "What are the elements that go into building a high performance team?" They are many: committed competent individuals; clear goals and objectives; well defined roles and responsibilities; excellent communication, etc. But what happens when one member of the team is less conscientious than the rest? How do you effectively deal with this individual without harming group productivity and morale?

This is an interesting and challenging question that plagues many teams in a variety of organizations. The reality is that by not responding and allowing this person to perpetuate their lackadaisical behavior, you will do more damage to the team's productivity and morale than if you had addressed the problem head on. Keep in mind that your team wants to succeed as individuals as well as collectively. A weak link will demoralize the collective culture and allow for rapid deterioration within the spirit of the team.

I recommend an aggressive, yet compassionate, approach to the resolution of the lackadaisical behavior. Try some of the following suggestions:

  • Promote a performance measurement campaign that allows for visibility around collective expectations. This campaign should set measurable standards for work to be done. The core of this system can be built on schedules, work break down structures, and work packages on individual assignments.
  • Speak openly in the team environment about each other's roles. Ensure that all individuals on the team understand their goals, mission and individual responsibilities. These conversations should be collaborative and constructive. Create an environment that fosters individual and collective accountability.
  • Provide team members with a structure around the charter, goals, values and mission for the group. Each team meeting should include reflection upon the norms created by the aforementioned items.
  • Remember, building an effective performance team takes time, and there may be instances along this path that cause friction for one or more members. Ensure that an open channel of communication, both formal and informal, is maintained among team members at all times.

If none of the above recommendations work to enhance the performance of this individual, more assertive and individual action must be taken. Begin an individual coaching and measurement process, which includes specific performance expectations. Meet with the team member and let him/her know about the problems their behavior is causing, and the potential negative impacts this will have on the team, project and organization.

Agree on coaching goals in writing, and set dates for periodic performance reviews. Follow up aggressively to ensure the team member's training/coaching needs are met in a proactive manner. If the individual does not respond to the personal attention, removal from the team will be necessary. Failure to do so will promote dissent within the team, and ultimately hurt the overall performance.

Throughout the experience, communication is critical. Do not allow speculation on performance issues. Deal with the situation directly, and although the team does not need to be privy to the details of any coaching or performance improvement techniques you may be employing, make sure they are aware that you, as a team leader, have addressed the situation and are working aggressively towards a resolution. Although these types of situations are difficult, a team leader must rise to the occasion in order to preserve the integrity of the team and maintain morale.

Don't forget to leave your comments below


Phil Ventresca is Founder, CEO and President of Advanced Management Services, Inc. (AMS), a full service management consultancy servicing an international client base. Since founding AMS nearly two decades ago Phil has lead the organization to becoming an internationally recognized provider of Consulting, Training and Assessment services. AMS's client base is comprised of Fortune 100/500 companies, medium-sized businesses and Government agencies that Phil has personally assisted in the creation of organizational and performance based solutions.

© Advanced Management Services, Inc. (AMS)

Comments (8)Add Comment
ahmedmashhood
...
written by Mashhood Ahmed, August 25, 2009
I have found 360 degree review along with feedback/suggestion, work pretty well. Mentor/Coach comes really handy in some situations.
Kupe
...
written by Kupe Kupersmith, August 25, 2009
Phil,
The majority of your points sound like a manager/employee relationship. Do you have recommendations on motivating someone on your project team who you have no managerial relationship? Thanks
dcbrubak
...
written by Denise Brubaker, August 25, 2009
Kupe has a good question. I run into that situation as well and would like recommendations. Thanks.
BrianC
...
written by Brian Chugg, August 25, 2009
"Performance measurement campaign"? "Speak openly in the team environment about each other's roles" isnt that a bit confrontational. "charter, goals, values and mission"?

What ever happended to a simple one on one chat with the individual, setting out expectations, breaking down tasks, identifying if there are personal issues the person is dealing with, perhaps they need some training and better guidance and direction.
patrix
...
written by Patrick Seemann, August 27, 2009
@Kupe: In these situations, I usually do two things
- work closely with the non-contributer and help him overcome any obstacles which are preventing him from doing his job (from his perspective). If you do this long enough, you'll easily find out whether this person is just unmotivated or is lacking some skills
- specifically track his progress and note any delays etc. This list helps very much for the talk with his line manager :-)
Kupe
...
written by Kupe Kupersmith, August 27, 2009
@patrix: Thanks for the tips. I'm on a project now with some potential of non-contributors. This is solely based on the number of stakeholders I will be interacting with. Some are bound to fall into the non-contributor list. I have communicated to the Pm and sponsor that it takes time to work with them and we are coming up with a mitigation strategy. we are also developing a plan where we can track our burn rate and see where some bottle necks arise. Thanks again!
pmulvey
...
written by Paul Mulvey, November 13, 2009
@Kupe - you should raise that as a risk to the PM as soon as you feel that it could be a problem. You don't want to put yourself in the firing line because someone did not provide you the information that you needed. If it gets to a push-comes-shove relationship, you had it logged as a risk. Initially, I would not do this publicly, but keep the PM informed. If it's the PM that's the non-contributor, you have far more problems!

Regarding motivation - work with the person, mentor the person, teach them some new skills. Sometimes, you'll find that the person has never had anyone teach them something new, and when they get some new knowledge, they are happy to apply it. Plus, you get the advantage that since you taught them how to do it, they are doing it in the way in which you need it delivered. win/win as they say.
Kupe
...
written by Kupe Kupersmith, November 13, 2009
@pmulvey - thanks. The project is going well. The team in general is very open and issues are handled as they arise. There is a great working relationship which avoids any conflict. And my PM is fabulous!

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
Click Here to login or create a free account.

busy