marcosMarcos Ferrer, CBAP has over 20 years experience in the practice of business analysis and the application of Information Technology for process improvement. Following graduation in 1983 from the University of Chicago, Mr. Ferrer joined IBM in Chicago, where he worked on requirements and systems implementations in diverse industries. His recent projects include working requirements for the Veteran's Administration, introducing BA practices at the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, and creating bowling industry models for NRG Bowl LLC. In November 2006, Marcos Ferrer is one of the first CBAPs certified by the IIBA. He has served as an elected member of the DC-Metro chapter of the IIBA, most recently as President, and assisted in the writing of the BOK 2.0 test.
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Announcing the Outstanding B.A. Moment in America Award

This month the O.B.A.M.A. award goes to the American Medical Association, for one of the most enlightened public positions on change I have ever heard articulated. The President of the AMA, speaking about HR 3200 (the evolving health bill in the House), said:

“It’s a solid start to achieving health reform this year that makes a positive difference for patients and physicians. The status quo is unacceptable. So let me be clear - without a bill that can pass the house, there is no health reform this year. But the debate is far from over. The AMA is going to be at the table to improve the final legislation….To the physicians of America I say – together we are stronger. .And to the patients of America I say - we are working to make the health care system better for you.”

Just THINK about the implications of this statement. Even though the health care bill is not perfect (the AMA has specific concerns about tort/malpractice and Medicare payment rates) they are backing a “risky” CHANGE PROCESS, with their eyes on the greater good.

How many of our societal institutions have “Unacceptable Status Quos”, yet persist in resisting change processes? In case my kind readers think “unacceptable” is too strong of a word (my readers would always offer the benefit of the doubt, no doubt), I offer the following buffet of “status quos” that resist scrutiny and possible change.

  1. The immense social and economic costs of enforcing “Prohibition” against marijuana, and treating hard drug addiction as a “moral” problem instead of a personal medical one.
  2. The strange fact that in the supposedly freest country in the world, we incarcerate more people than anyone except China, which has over five times our population.
  3. The insistence on “free market” processes in the face of the fact that no such thing exists, and the track record of its passionate supporters includes two Depressions plus world class executive performance bonuses in the middle of the second.
  4. The vanishing of journalism and its accompanying ethics.
  5. Ongoing economic discrimination against women, minorities, foreigners.
  6. Basing policy on (and destroying our economy because of) a terrorist stunt, statistically rare, and nowhere near as harmful as cars, cigarettes, alcohol, cancer, even bathrooms (yes, bathrooms kill).
  7. The persistence in emphasizing time and cost over quality in American endeavors (no one is less surprised than me that GM has “failed”).
  8. Taking 12 ounce drinks from airline passengers, because of the potential “danger”, and then tossing them into garbage cans in the screening area.

Remember, sometimes the emperor really has no clothes – now is a good time to speak candidly about the value of change, the process of change, and to be honest about the risks, even as the risk of not changing increases.

Rather than dwell on the negative, I ask my kind readers to send me THEIR examples of an Outstanding B.A. Moment in America, for publishing here!

Have fun, and submit your comments below.

Marcos Ferrer, CBAP has over 20 years experience in the practice of business analysis and the application of Information Technology for process improvement. While still a student at the University of Chicago, he developed a consulting practice with local property management and accounting firms. Following graduation in 1983, Mr. Ferrer joined IBM in Chicago, where he worked on requirements and systems implementations in diverse industries. In 1990, Mr. Ferrer became an independent consultant, again working with a variety of clients in the family entertainment industry and then for 10 years at the U.S. Department of Labor, converting legacy COBOL systems into real time client server systems. His recent projects include working requirements for the Veteran’s Administration, introducing BA practices at the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, and creating bowling industry models for NRG Bowl LLC. In November 2006, Marcos Ferrer became one of the first 18 CBAPs certified by the IIBA. He has served as an elected member of the DC-Metro chapter of the IIBA, most recently as President, and assisted in the writing of the BOK 2.0 test.

Comments (6)Add Comment
...
written by Tara Ondusky, July 28, 2009
I understand the frustration, and admit that I've not read the proposed legislation cover to cover, but I find interesting that many of the status quo examples provided are of big brother providing much oversight, yet that's what this healthcare bill seems to be. More big brother. I'm very confused about it's ability to support a free market. I'm worried that in a few years we'll be complaining that not only do the HMO's tell us who we can and cannot choose, but so will our government.
...
written by Marcos Ferrer, July 28, 2009
A very good commentary, in my opinion. We should all worry about government force, at all times. Where the government, just like individuals and corporataions resists change, it resists success. Where "big brother" is cited above (maybe not as much as suggested by the comment), resistance to change SHOULD be broken down. Make no mistake - the current status quo is and has been supported by government policy - the question is not IF the government is doing anything, it is WHAT, and the WHAT tends to get entrenched, become a special interest, and resist change at the cost of all stakeholders. Witness employer based insurance company business, which is very entrenched in current employer/employee behavior, tax law, and established judicial rulings.
...
written by Patrick Gostovich, July 29, 2009
You're sixth point is particularly offensive, calling the greatest terrorist attack on American soil a stunt...you are just another progessive pinhead.
...
written by Joanne Gaudet, July 30, 2009
Why a peronsal political view is sitting in a site for professial BSA's is confusing. Did you post in the wrong forum?
...
written by Patrick Gostovich, July 30, 2009
Ferrer's entire blog is a personal political view. It starts at begining with the acronym for the 'award' for cripes sakes....
...
written by Melanie Woodall, August 12, 2009
I thought this was a great post and I completely agree.

Write comment
We love to see comments! However, please do not market or sell any products. Your comment will be removed immediately!
smaller | bigger

busy