Tag: Change Management

Transition Requirements – The Key To Adoption

Written by Tiffany Wiley on September 18, 2024. Posted in Articles.

The key to adoption. Don’t forget the obvious.

As a Business Analyst at heart, requirements play a part in my everyday life. Much to the annoyance of those closest to me, I’m wired to think of everyday activities in terms of requirements 😊

However, transition requirements are sometimes elusive, even to those of us with a couple of decades of experience. But – they are the key to adoption!

A quick little story time…

When my daughter went to her first school, we spent weeks preparing; we got her a backpack and matching lunchbox, new school clothes, new shoes, and a sleeping mat, and we even planned a lunch and snack menu! I even read the school handbook, multiple times! At 3.5 years old; she’s spent her entire life with just the three of us. She never went to a daycare, so this was her first school-like experience, and we were ALL excited! Nevertheless, in all that preparation, we neglected a key piece of information – WE would not stay with her at school.

As we unbuckled her, with excitement beaming from her eyes, she stated “Mommy, we are all going to have so much fun today!”. At that moment, I knew I missed a key piece of information that was going to completely change how the rest of the day went. Oops! And it did…she was distraught! Then I was too!

In all my functional preparation, I neglected to operationalize her new school experience. I completely missed considering my key stakeholder’s transition!

Even with over 18 years of requirements management experience, I forgot the obvious. This is your call to action – don’t forget the obvious!

What are transition requirements?

Transition Requirements (or Transitional Requirements) are like NFRs (Non-Functional Requirements), in that they are often missed in the design and development processes.

As the name suggests, these are the requirements that will ensure a successful transition from the current to the future state.

Why are they important?

Without a plan to transition from the current state to the future state, adoption will surely slow if not stop entirely. You as the Product/Project Manager may be excited about this change, but excitement alone doesn’t cross the finish line!

A transition (or migration) will likely impact other business units and processes. For example, a customer may need to upgrade a current licensing agreement to transition to a new solution. Do you wait to transition them? What is the impact of waiting? Are there legal implications? Is additional training required?

Additionally, on the softer side of a transition, is understanding the change curve. Especially when it comes to process or culture-related changes, transitions can be very difficult. People are creatures of comfort – i.e., creatures of familiarity. And change is unfamiliar….it is uncomfortable. Having a good understanding of change management can help ensure there aren’t gaps in the transition plan and requirements.

How does that tie into overall value?

Value is realized when the solution is adopted. A single transition requirement alone does not generally provide quantitative value. However, the overall plan and requirements’ existence provides a qualitative value by ensuring a successful transition can happen – leading to better adoption and ultimate solution value realization.

Technique for gathering Transition Requirements?

Transition requirements should only be defined once the final solution is known. It doesn’t need to be fully implemented, but it must be known.

Unlike functional (or stakeholder) requirements, these are typically not willingly disclosed or stated by the business or users. Because of this, my favorite technique to start with is questions; to elicit information to then derive the transition requirements from that information. It is important to have a listing of questions to start with, but also being present in the discussion will help uncover additional questions to minimize gaps and assumptions.

Some sample questions and follow-up questions are noted below:

Are there any user skill gaps that need to be filled to operationalize the new solution?
- Is this a training we can provide, or do we need outside help?
- What is the cost of this effort?
- What type of internal messaging is required?
Is there any data that needs to be migrated from the current to the future system?
- If so, how can that be done?
- Migrate all data? Only some data?
- Does data need to be transformed?
- How long to prep? Migrate? Validate?
- Are there any regulatory requirements for transmitting the data?
- What are the ideal timelines?
What is required to retire the current solution?
- Can it just be turned off/eliminated?
  - Do user accounts need to be deactivated?
- Is there a cost associated with terminating (or ending early)?
- Will data need to be deleted? Can it (contractually) be deleted?
What processes need to change to implement the new solution?
- How/when will this process change happen?
- How/when will it be communicated?

Additionally, think about the differences between the two solutions/states. Then identify some questions, even if they seem silly, to help elicit information. Listed below are a couple of sample projects with a few starting questions:

Set your launch up for success by not forgetting the obvious – Transition Requirements.

Three Keys to Building a Strong Process Management Foundation

Written by Madison Lundquist on August 29, 2024. Posted in Articles.

Effective process management is not something that can be built overnight but is critical to the success of process management programs. Recent research by APQC indicates that only 52% of organizations feel their process management programs are somewhat effective, and only 11% feel they are very effective. However, the survey findings also point out three opportunities for growth:

Align process programs with organizational strategy
Measure process performance
Ensure a strong focus on process governance

Organizations looking to leverage opportunities for growth and to build their process program on a strong foundation should consider the points outlined in this article.

First, the structure.

Organizations can structure their process team in a variety of ways; and most often, the same way won’t work best for every organization. According to APQC’s research, most organizations (44%) have centralized process teams, 29% have federated teams, 14% have decentralized teams, and 13% follow an ad hoc approach.

While organizations will favor the structure that works best with their organization’s overall structure; there are pros and cons to consider with each structure.

Next, align to strategy.

Process work has traditionally involved teams driving efficiencies in cost, cycle time, and throughput. However, over the last few years, process teams are shifting these tactical objectives under broader organizational drivers.

While some organizations are not aligning to strategy as well as they should, 49% of organizations do align their process efforts to organizational strategy.

Strategy and process management activities should intertwine and inform each other. The following best practices lead to greater alignment of strategy with the work of the rest of the organization:

Planning – Do not limit strategic planning processes to the corporate level, and make sure that the planning process is constantly evolving with business needs and forecasts. Continuous improvement is a best-practice mantra.
Measurement – Use qualitative data in addition to carefully selected quantitative data points to set strategic plans but remember that financial numbers only tell part of the story. Qualitative information can provide the context needed to make valid decisions.
Organizational structure, communication, and culture – Strategic plans should include processes for communicating strategy. The organization will never be aligned if strategy is not clearly and consistently communicated and discussed. Embed strategic planning into people’s roles, driving employees to feel motivated to contribute and feel that their time is valued.
Process design – Integrate the strategic planning process with quality processes. Be sure that quality and strategy inform each other and enable enterprise success.

Lastly, measure process performance.

Once organizations have selected their team structure and defined their strategy, it’s time to consider how they will measure the performance of their process efforts. When organizations were asked how they use measures in managing process performance, 30% of organizations only use ad hoc measures, and 16% have no process measures at all.

Measurement enables decision making at all levels in the organization. Without measuring, leaders manage and make changes in the dark, without a clear view of which changes need to be made and where.

Determining which measures align with strategic goals is the first step. Once the organization selects the initial sets of measures for the different audiences (e.g., executives, business units, departments, managers, frontline workers), those measures can be tracked over time and tweaked as necessary. When an organization can look at its performance on a granular level and see how those pieces roll up into high-level metrics, it can begin to adjust in the places where they will make the biggest difference.

Don’t forget about process governance.

Organizations can have the best process program strategies, linked to organizational objectives and with smart measures in place; however, if the right governance is not in place, those plans can fail.

Governance encompasses all the structural elements that help process management function and often dictates the efficiency and speed at which an organization implements and embeds process management into its practices. Appropriate governance ensures that the right changes are made to processes and that policies surrounding process design and management are clear and relevant to the entire enterprise.

According to APQC’s survey, 75% of organizations have process owners present in their organization and 57% have process improvement specialists. Only 38% of organizations have champions or steering committees, which vitally provide oversight and governance for process work, help to prioritize opportunities, and align processes and process work with organizational strategy and objectives. Thankfully, the number of process sponsors and champions at organizations has improved since the last time this survey was conducted in 2020, showing the increased importance organizations have placed on these more strategic process roles.

Process management programs are not built overnight, and they all follow a different path. Starting with the key topics outlined in this article can help organizations get off on the right foot.

Best of: 10 Soft Skills You’ll Need To Be A Successful Business Analyst

Written by Lee Templeton on August 21, 2024. Posted in Articles.

You might already know the technical skills you’ll need to be a great Business Analyst (BA) but do you know the essential soft skills? The role of a BA is deeply rooted in working with people. You’ll often be coordinating with stakeholders, running workshops, or presenting documentation to teams. To be a successful BA you’ll need the following soft skills to compliment the technical ones.

Rapport Building

You’ll need to build rapport with your stakeholders early in a project which you can do in many ways. While you’re waiting for a meeting to start ask your stakeholders questions like, “how is your day going?”, “what are you doing in the weekend?”. I’ve been in meetings where everyone is silent until the workshop begins. Take advantage of this time to build rapport by finding common interests, showing empathy or complimenting them on something such as a tie, a picture in the background of the Zoom or their promptness. This may seem trivial, but it will set you up to succeed as the project rolls out. Your stakeholders will be more likely to attend meetings/workshops, feel more comfortable contributing and start to champion the project and the changes you’re making within the organization.

Empathy

The Oxford Dictionary defines Empathy as ‘The ability to understand and share the feelings of another’. This is an important soft skill for a BA because we need to put ourselves in our stakeholders’ shoes to understand the problems we are trying to solve. To have empathy means to understand the pain points within the organizations Current State which is essential when we’re trying to fix them. Try to imagine how frustrating it must feel to have outdated, manual process at work when the technology we use at home is so advanced these days. Use empathy to speak to these pain points and get stakeholder buy in and drive user adoption.

Enthusiasm

Depending on the scope of your project Stakeholders may be attending a lot of workshops and meetings so it’s important to be enthusiastic and positive about what you’re doing. Let’s be honest there’s nothing worse than a dull or dry workshop consisting of people talking at you with slides of written content. To get people to come along for the journey we need to engage them and be enthusiastic about what we’re doing. Speak positively about the benefits and outcomes of your project, show visual diagrams and ask questions to get people involved. Having a positive and bright disposition will pick people up when they engage with you, help them focus on the content and be more likely to contribute.

Active listening

When we’re working on current state or establishing things like user journeys, user personas, use cases or processes a key soft skill you’ll need is Active Listening. Active listening is a pattern of listening that means listening to verbal and non-verbal cues without judging or jumping to conclusions. When you’re active listening you’re not thinking about what to say next you are completely focused on the person communicating. Don’t interrupt them or propose solutions at this stage, instead paraphrase and reflect what you’ve heard back to the person. This will ensure you don’t miss anything, don’t misinterpret anything and help you understand the paint points your users are experiencing in more depth.

Creativity

When making changes to the organization such as processes, we need to find solutions that work for everyone. For this we will need to think outside the box because realistically we may not be able to meet everyone’s needs, or some people may just be averse to the changes. To facilitate the transition, we can use creative visualizations to get everyone on board the journey; Miro, Figma and Visio are great tools for creating visual diagrams. You can do role plays during workshops, online or in person to outline the steps of a new process. Be creative and use your imagination to make it fun and engaging for your stakeholders.

Adaptability

As a BA you may find yourself on new projects for new businesses often and every situation will be unique. You will need to assess each business’s unique culture, ways of working and environment. Some businesses may be very formal and highly governed while others may be casual and more agile in their approach. To be successful in all these environments you need to be able to adapt, this means finding the right language, terminology, pace, document structure and hierarchy. Recently I worked on a project for a very successful company that still had a startup mentality. They embraced agile ways of working and feared having their autonomy taken away, because of this the word ‘Governance’ was a trigger for many of the staff. We had to adapt our language to suit the client and instead of ‘Governance’ we used ‘Guidelines’. Be adaptable and understand the culture you are working in, don’t work against it, work with it.

Communication

Clear and concise communication is important to be successful as a BA. When working with people things can get lost in translation, its our jobs as BAs to ensure they don’t get lost! Be willing to speak up and ask for more detail if you don’t understand something or when you notice others aren’t understanding it either. At times you may need to control the pace of a discussion, to speed it up to keep people engaged or to slow it down if it is moving too fast. There are times when you will need to paraphrase what someone has said to communicate it more effectively to the broader audience. You can use terms like “what I’m hearing is…” or “To put that another way might be…”. Utilizing your communication skills will ensure workshops and meetings stay on topic and you get what you need out of them.

Patience

You may find yourself in a situation where you already know the journey ahead for your stakeholders for example a company is implementing an out-of-the-box solution. You’ll need patience to assess their current state to find gaps and bring the stakeholders along for the journey so they can get excited about their new technology and processes, even though you already know the outcome. Another example of using patience is in workshops where different participants repeat information to you, you need to actively listen so they feel heard, but it could get a little boring for you. Lastly, not everyone you encounter is going to be a great communicator, some people talk for too long, some people get off topic, some people are hard to understand, and you need to listen to these stakeholders trying to communicate ineffectively and decipher what they’re saying, this takes patience.

Improvisation

You will find yourself in meetings with technical people, non-technical people and people from all different units of the business. Analogies are a great way to explain complex strategies or technology to people that don’t understand what you’re talking about. If someone doesn’t understand something a great way to describe it to them in terms they can understand may be using analogies. You can improvise and tell them about “One time I went to the supermarket and at the checkout this happened…. Which is like this technology system that does this…”. You will get better at this over time and come to understand what works for stakeholders from different Business Units.

Conflict Resolution

Often our stakeholders may disagree on things like current state or how future state should be. We need to manage both points of view and bring the team to a consensus where possible. Consensus may not be possible in all situations, but we still need to handle the conversations constructively so that everyone agrees upon the next steps. Some pointers for conflict resolutions are

Defuse Anger and facilitate communication
Separate people from problems
Listen first, talk second
Set out the facts
Explore options together

Using these tips, we can find a way to move forward together and keep the project on track.

People Process and Tooling (The PPT framework) is a great way to approach IT changes within an organization. I believe the most important aspect in this framework is people because the technology and processes are no good if the people within the organization don’t use them. You can use these soft skills as a BA’s when engaging people to ensure organizational changes are adopted and in turn, you will be successful too.

How to Mitigate Scope Creep

Written by Esther Folorunso on July 24, 2024. Posted in Articles.

The BABOK emphasizes that scope is about defining clear boundaries. It’s about understanding what the project or solution entails and what it doesn’t. While there is no clear definition of the word scope in the BABOK, it does refer to this concept in some ways: scope modeling, solution scope, etc.

However, have you ever felt like a project kept growing in size and complexity, slowly eating away at your resources and deadlines? Well, the culprit has a name: scope creep. As a business analyst or project manager, one of the most challenging aspects of any project is ensuring effective control over scope creep.

By the way, what exactly does the word scope creep mean?

Scope creep, sometimes called requirements creep, is simply the addition of requirements, tasks, or deliverables that are usually more often than not out of the project scope. Another definition by the PMBOK explains scope creep as “adding features and functionality (project scope) without addressing the effects on time, costs, and resources, or without customer approval. This situation often results in pressure to deliver beyond the initial agreed-upon scope, as formally stated in the project charter. This uncontrolled expansion happens without corresponding adjustments to time, cost, and resources, leading to significant project overruns.

Therefore, to achieve successful project delivery, it is crucial to understand scope creep and how to mitigate it.

What are some of the causes of scope creep?

Poor scope definition and work breakdown structure (WBS): A too-broad or poorly defined scope often results in misunderstandings about project requirements and goals, steering projects off course. This ambiguity creates a high potential for scope creep. Also, if the initial project goals and deliverables are poorly defined or leave room for interpretation, changes and additions become easy to justify.
Ambiguous Project Objectives: Vague or ambiguous project goals can lead to differing interpretations and expectations among stakeholders. Setting ambitious goals that are out of reach for the allocated time and resources can lead to pressure to add features or functionalities to meet those goals, even if it strains the project.
Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen: Having an excessive number of stakeholders with decision-making power can create confusion and lead to conflicting requests that push the project beyond its original scope.
Poor stakeholder engagement: Internal disagreements among stakeholders and inadequate planning also contribute to scope creep. Simply defining the scope isn’t enough; it’s essential to consider and address stakeholder opinions and concerns to prevent scope creep.
Changing Market Conditions: Changing market conditions, such as new trends or competitive pressures, often trigger scope creep by prompting the inclusion of new project features or requirements not initially planned. This expansion can lead to the project’s scope exceeding its original boundaries, impacting timelines, budgets, and resources.
Lack of Change Control Process: The absence of a formal change control process allows for unauthorized modifications to the project scope, leading to scope creep and potentially impacting project timelines, budgets, and outcomes.

Impact of Scope Creep

Budget Overruns: Additional features or requirements will typically require more resources, leading to increased costs.
Resource Strain: Team members may become overextended, leading to burnout and decreased productivity.
Quality Compromise: Rushed or inadequately planned changes can affect the overall quality of the deliverables.
Schedule Delays: Unplanned additions to the project scope can extend the project timeline and even lead to missed deadlines.
Stakeholder Dissatisfaction: Failure to manage expectations and deliver within agreed-upon parameters can lead to dissatisfaction and a loss of trust among stakeholders.

Methods for dealing with scope creep:

A clear definition of the project scope is necessary.

All stakeholders must ensure that the scope statement is detailed and agreed upon. Before starting any project, we must establish a clear definition of the project scope and a baseline. To arrive at a clearly defined scope, the thorough gathering and documentation of requirements is the first line of defense against scope creep. Using techniques such as interviews, workshops, and surveys ensures clarity and completeness from the outset. Successful completion of this process will aid in the development of clearly defined objectives and requirements. When project goals and requirements are well defined from the beginning, it prevents misunderstandings and ensures alignment across all stakeholders. This clarity sets the foundation for a focused project scope and minimizes the likelihood of scope creep throughout the project lifecycle.

Change Management

It is crucial to implement a robust change control process. This includes having a formal process for evaluating and authorizing any changes to the project scope. Developing and enforcing a structured process for submitting, evaluating, and approving scope changes is crucial for maintaining project integrity. The criteria for assessing change requests should be part of this process, guaranteeing their alignment with the project goals and their ability to fit within the existing constraints.

Impact Analysis

Conducting impact analysis for proposed changes will help understand their effect on the project. Assessing each change request’s implications on the project’s timeline, budget, and resources will help to make informed decisions. By incorporating this, one can effectively manage scope creep and ensure projects stay on track for success.

Requirement Prioritization

Working with stakeholders to prioritize requirements and features based on business value and feasibility is important. It is important to use techniques such as MoSCoW (must have, should have, could have, won’t have) to categorize requirements and manage stakeholder expectations effectively.

Regular Reviews

It is important to regularly review project progress against the baseline or agreed-upon scope. This helps to identify and address scope deviations promptly. Weekly touchpoints or standup meetings with stakeholders based on the agreed-upon project approach could accomplish this.

Conclusion

In conclusion, scope creep is a real and ever-present threat to project success. However, the strategies mentioned above can effectively address this threat. Bear in mind that clear communication, proactive planning, and a commitment to a well-defined scope are your best weapons in the fight against scope creep. With these tools in your arsenal, you can deliver projects on time and within budget that meet the original objectives, ensuring success for both you and your stakeholders.

Beyond Frameworks: Agile Insights from a BA’s Odyssey

Written by Afaq Qazi on April 18, 2024. Posted in Articles.

Reflecting on my journey from a Junior Business Analyst to a seasoned Business Analyst and eventually evolving into a role where Business Analysis and Product Management intersect, I’ve had the privilege to contribute to organizations as diverse as Boeing, Rolls-Royce, and EPAM, alongside navigating the unique challenges of smaller entities.

This path, spanning over 13 years and multiple domains, has equipped me with a deep understanding of Business Analysis from the grassroots, teaching me the crucial balance between adhering to frameworks and embracing the agility necessary for today’s dynamic business environment. This narrative is an exploration of that journey, emphasizing the transition from rigid methodologies to agile adaptability, and the critical importance of customer focus and stakeholder management.

In the early stages of my career, the allure of frameworks was undeniable. They presented a structured way of understanding Business Analysis and Product Management, offering a semblance of control and predictability in the chaotic realm of project management.

However, as I progressed, the limitations of these frameworks became increasingly apparent. The real-world application of Business Analysis goes beyond the confines of any framework. It demands an acute awareness of the shifting business landscape and the ability to think on one’s feet—a blend of deep analytical thinking and pragmatic street smarts.

This evolution in perspective was mirrored in my approach to project management. Initially, my focus was on mastering the technical aspects: understanding the ‘what’ and ‘why’ to navigate towards solutions and create value for users. Yet, I quickly learned that the essence of effective Business Analysis lies in the ability to communicate, adapt, and understand the broader business context—skills that are foundational yet flourish only with experience and deliberate practice.

Communication emerged as the cornerstone of my professional development. The capacity to engage with a diverse set of stakeholders—customers, engineers, designers, and executives—and synthesize their insights is paramount. It’s a skill that goes beyond mere articulation; it’s about understanding the audience, choosing the right words, and effectively conveying complex ideas in a manner that resonates.

This skill set has been instrumental in navigating the complexities of projects, ensuring alignment across teams, and driving towards common goals with clarity and purpose.

As I embraced the agile methodology, the importance of flexibility became glaringly evident. Agile is not just a buzzword; it’s a mindset that values adaptability, customer-centricity, and continuous improvement.

It challenged me to think differently about project management, to be more iterative in my approach, and to prioritize direct feedback loops with stakeholders and customers. This agility has been crucial in climbing the project ladder, allowing for rapid pivots and adjustments in response to new insights or changing market dynamics.

Customer focus and stakeholder management have been the bedrock of my growth as a Business Analyst. Recognizing the criticality of these aspects, I’ve dedicated myself to becoming adept at navigating the complex web of stakeholder relationships and ensuring that the voice of the customer is always at the forefront of decision-making. This has involved honing my ability to manage expectations, articulate value propositions clearly, and foster an environment of trust and collaboration.

In retrospect, the journey from adhering strictly to frameworks to adopting a more flexible, agile approach has been transformative. It has taught me that while frameworks provide valuable guidance, the essence of Business Analysis and Product Management lies in the ability to adapt, communicate effectively, and maintain a relentless focus on the customer and business objectives.

As I continue to navigate this ever-evolving landscape, these insights will remain central to my approach, guiding my decisions and actions in the pursuit of creating meaningful, impactful solutions.